I think that you're absolutely right that you don't know the circumstances of the situation. Because of this I'm not sure you can make any judgements about either of our behaviours. I honestly don't see how what I have said is an insult. I am not even attacking him. I am trying to talk about this situation because I was denied a voice on chat from him banning me based on his poor mood.
I said that I was in a bad mood, true enough. But you insulted Psykolog twice for no visible reason and got warned for that, you two (alongside with Iak) had a heated discussion that wasn't helping the chat in any way, I throwed in a rather harsh (but still non-rude and well-meant) response to the discussion and even suggested that you should move the discussion into the PM where heated discussions belong in the first place. Your response was something like "boss hogg", I warned you again by "Hush it, Matt"... And you proceeded to say something of this sort again, can't remember, something with "leash" or "whip"? dunno anymore, but still, I warned you for two different offenses and you had no visible intention to live it down, so I proceeded straight to the 2 hour-ban.
And even if you're in the right (I and the witnesses of the incident doubt that, though), like ClariS said, it's not helping you in any way to attack me on a personal level when I banned you for a reason.